Forbes : les meilleurs Paradis Fiscaux

Article paru dans Forbes le 07 Juin 2010

World’s Best Tax Havens

Richard Murphy, 07.06.10, 06:55 PM EDT

Here are the top 10 places where you can hide money from prying eyes rather easily.

Even if you’ve worked for some years trying to prevent the problems caused by tax havens, people will still ask you which places are the best in the world to shield your money from taxes. Working with the Tax Justice Network I set out to provide a definitive answer.

« Best » is, of course, a pretty subjective term, so it needed definition. We used two. The first was a measure of a place’s opacity, or how secret it is. There’s good reason for that. Some time ago I gave up trying to define what a tax haven is, as that proved to be a pretty thankless task. Instead I suggested that unless a place is a secrecy jurisdiction, which means that regulation is intentionally created for the primary benefit and use of those not resident there, it really can’t operate as a tax haven. In effect, secrecy jurisdictions create regulation that is designed to undermine the legislation or regulation of another jurisdiction.

To facilitate its use, secrecy jurisdictions also create a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that shields the identities of those making use of its flexible regulatory system. This is important. Even though people who use secrecy jurisdiction claim their activities are perfectly legal, it seems they don’t want people to find out about them. So secrecy is a key.

Secondly, enjoying secrecy in a place that does not have the know-how to handle money is not of much use if, like most users of secrecy jurisdictions, you want to move money without too many questions being asked. That’s why we added another criterion, a pretty simple one: To be considered significant, a place had to have the capability to move money in serious quantities, or it just didn’t rank.

These two characteristics, when combined, create an index of secrecy jurisdictions, or tax havens if you prefer, called the Financial Secrecy Index

The research was fascinating. First we had to determine what places were secrecy jurisdictions. To do this we created a « list of lists » looking at tax haven listings over a period of more than 30 years and selecting for testing, broadly speaking, all those that came on two lists or more over that period. Then our team researched data on a wide range of issues–about 200 variables per location (See all the results, available here.).

Twelve criteria were then selected as key indicators of opacity, varying from whether there was formal banking secrecy or not, to whether accounts were required to be on public record, to how many tax information exchange agreements the jurisdictions had. The place got a mark for being opaque and none if it was transparent. This produced a list of the usual suspects: Switzerland, Malaysia (Labuan), Barbados, Bahamas, Vanuatu, Belize, Brunei, Dominica, Samoa, Seychelles, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and Grenadine, and Turks and Caicos.

Next we had to determine the amount of cash flowing through each location using International Monetary Fund data. The top 10 here were:

The U.K. (City of London), the U.S. (Delaware), Luxembourg, Switzerland, Cayman Islands, Ireland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Belgium and Bermuda.

Of course we’re not saying that all of this cash is illicit–far from it–but if you’re going to hide illicit cash, where better to do it? Where it stands out from the crowd, or where it can be lost like a needle in the proverbial haystack? Big numbers help the owner of dubious cash lose theirs in the crowd, and the places named above are big.

Combine the two rankings (deploying a little mathematics along the way, I admit) and you get the overall top 10 list. These are the 10 most significant secrecy jurisdictions in the world, in the opinion of the Tax Justice Network: the U.S. (Delaware), Luxembourg, Switzerland, Cayman Islands, the U.K. (City of London), Ireland, Bermuda, Singapore, Belgium and Hong Kong.

That final list is going to surprise, shock or even annoy a lot of people, but there is good reason for listing places like London and Delaware as tax havens among those which might be considered the more usual suspects.

Secrecy is not something, as many like to think, that happens « over there. » It is really happening at home too. Delaware provides a degree of corporate secrecy for those who operate there that makes it highly significant. Incidentally Nevada and other states also offer this feature, but because more companies use Delaware, it stood out from the crowd.

London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more « usual suspect » jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute.

http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/06/tax-havens-delaware-bermuda-markets-singapore-belgium.html

Commentaires

  1. Abi a écrit

    there are two debates aruond this whole issue. The first is the private political debate among the members of the OECD, G8 and the G20. That debate is about 3 things, market share for their own business, and for the states themselves also engaged in the provision of international business and financial services; domestic tax reform e.g high versus sensible rates of income tax ( or rather the continuing absence of it); and business modelling, how companies structure their global affairs to manage 1 and 2 above. All of which can be crystallised into one word competition. At the company level for customers and shareholders and at the country level for financial services business. For public consumption this debate is repackaged aruond issues like tax fairness,corruption and bribery, poverty, secrecy the immoral and unethical behaviour of MNCs, tax justice and aggressive tax planning. All of these emotive issues are then condensed into one phrase : tax haven. Once we understand that it is competition that is at the heart of the private debate then the types of standards crafted and sought to be enforced on those not part of that dialogue will mean that some countries and states will be allowed to operate outside the rules using convenient constitutional excuses like the difference between state law and federal law Thanks for your comment! Fran

  2. Johne235 a écrit

    Neat blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Thanks cgdefegbgkek

Réagir à cet article

Nous respectons votre vie privée, votre email ne sera pas affiché sur le site, ni partagé avec des tiers.